Because that’s what they did last year.
We’ve all been there – staring at a switch cabinet full of flashing lights and thinking, “Let’s just replace it like for like.” It feels safer. Simpler. Familiar.
But if your school or trust is planning a network refresh – whether through a full tender or a framework – it’s worth asking: do we really need this much kit?
In one recent school network review, over 2,200 switch ports were in place. But the number of wired devices was dramatically lower. Like-for-like replacement would have meant replicating an overprovisioned estate – great for the budget of a networking vendor, less so for a school chasing value for money.
It’s easy to spend days tweaking procurement documents and nudging suppliers for a 0.5% discount. But reducing the number of switches by 10%? That saves 10%. No negotiation required.
Modern networks are often designed to be wireless-first. Printers, admin PCs, and specialist labs need ports – but most teaching and learning is mobile. Keeping switches in every classroom because “we’ve always had them” doesn’t reflect how pupils now use technology.
So, before your tender goes out:
Here’s another value conversation: do you need a 4-hour replacement warranty, or would 24 hours be acceptable? Would you rather hold £1,000 in spare kit in case of failure – or let a head of faculty use that money to buy actual learning resources?
It’s about risk. But it’s also about return.
There’s nothing wrong with like-for-like replacement when it’s genuinely needed. But the real strategic value lies in challenging the default. “Why did we cross the road?” is a good question – especially if the road no longer goes anywhere.
Gain Digital Confidence so you can ask the right questions before you spend the money.